The Trump administration very clearly stated its intention to restrict the reproductive rights during the Union's situation in the last night of the Union .
Today's abortive state abortion legislation – in particular laws that protect a person's right to abortion later in a pregnancy. His remarks contained a series of false statements and dangerous rhetoric that only compound the stigma and confusion about reproductive rights.
Here we will go through each of his false statements individually and point to actual legislation, statistics and medicine experts for further clarification.
Trump said a New York law "would allow a baby to be taken from the mother's womb." That's not true.
The Trump legislation in New York does not permit abortion just before birth. Instead, the Reproductive Health Bill (19459016), signed by Governor Andrew Cuomo on January 22, was used as a state protection measure for those seeking abortions in line with the guarantees already established in Roe v. Wade
The legislation states: "A health practitioner who is authorized, certified, or empowered in his lawful scope may perform an abortion if judged reasonably and in good faith based on the facts of the patient : the patient is within twenty-four weeks of starting pregnancy or the lack of viability of the fetus or abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the patient. "
That means a person's right to abortion is protected until 24 weeks. The vast majority of abortions – over 90 percent – occur within the first 13 weeks, according to the latest data available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Another 7.6 percent of abortions take place between 14 and 20 weeks; and only 1.3 percent of abortions are done after 20 weeks. As a reference, a pregnancy at 37 weeks, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) .
Once again, New York legislation "does not allow a baby to be allowed." Moments of birth torn from the womb. "It allows abortions 24 weeks ago, well before a pregnancy is considered full-time or even early, and it also allows for 24-week abortions only when" there is no fetal viability or abortion is necessary for life or health A tragic account of this type of predicament can be found here which is very different from the graphical situation that President Trump has presented.
"No abortions are allowed in the third trimester As Trump has hinted, "said Daniel Grossman, director of Advancing New Standards on Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), tells SELF.
When Trump spoke about abortion at the Union's state home, he said," These are living, sentient "Beautiful babies." Medical experts would argue that by definition, a fetus does not live alone, but the idea of the fetus pain, which seems to be at the center of this statement, continues to be taken up. As SELF reported the claims that a fetus can feel pain after 20 weeks are at best doubtful. "The best available evidence suggests that the fetus can not feel pain 26-28 weeks ago," says Dr. Grossman. "The neural connections that allow pain perception are simply not present before this developmental stage."
Trump said the Virginia governor "stated he was going to execute a baby after giving birth." That's not what happened.
It appears he was referring to Governor Ralph Northam regarding Virginia's HB2491 the various barriers to accessing abortions such as the requirement that abortions be performed in hospitals compulsory 24-hour wait, compulsory ultrasound, and the need for more than one doctor to certify that a second abortion is medically necessary to protect the health or life of the parent. (These abortion restrictions, ironically, often lead to delays in abortions.) Eliminating these abortions would theoretically reduce the number of abortions later in pregnancy.)
Speaking about a local radio station program [Gouverneur Northam] a hypothetical circumstance under which a person with a non-viable pregnancy enters the job market. "In this particular example, I can tell you exactly what would happen if a mother is working," he said. "The baby would be freed, the baby would feel well, the baby would be revived if the mother and the family desired it, and then there would be a discussion between the doctors and the mother."
Some people accepted this statement as advocating a kind of killing for a healthy child, but a spokesman for the governor made it clear that his comments "focused on the tragic and extremely rare case in which one Woman with a case of disability lived pregnant or severe fetal anomalies went into labor. "The full interview can be heard here (the question comes at 38:45), in which Northam also replied:" Therefore, decisions should how these are hit by providers, doctors, and mothers and mothers fathers who are involved. "
Trump called on Congress to ban" late cancellations, "which is not an actual medical term.
He urged Congress to take action: "To defend the dignity of every human being, I urge Congress to pass a bill prohibiting the late abortion of children who can feel pain in the womb."  It is not clear exactly what Trump means by "late abortions" an arbitrary political term rather than a medical distinction . It is possible that he meant after 20 weeks, but as we have already mentioned, after this point there is only a very small percentage of 1.3 percent.
"Speaking about abortions in the third trimester, as the President has talked about last night is equivalent to extinguishing a fire that does not burn." Willie J. Parker MD, MPH, Chief Executive Officer of Doctors for Reproductive Health, tells SELF.
If discontinuations occur after 20 weeks, they are primarily due to health problems affecting the parent and / or fetus, which may be detectable in later pregnancy Parker says , Laws prohibiting these procedures would make it even more difficult for these patients to take care of the care their care providers deemed necessary.
These problems may include severe anomalies, such as a fetus that has only two instead of four ventricles, or undeveloped functional lung – problems that prevent the fetus from becoming viable. In these cases, Dr. Parker, it is crucial that parents have the opportunity to talk to their doctor about it. "Parents, in consultation with their care provider, may reserve the right to make a determined decision to end their pregnancy with compassion – even if they reach the third trimester – to avoid the inevitable suffering should the delivery of birth be an often lost one Ingredient, "he says. The notion that every pregnancy runs perfectly normal, that any pregnancy that reaches the third trimester on an unavoidable "path to a life of health, wealth, comfort and privilege is a fallacy," he adds.
https: / /twitter.com/DrDGrossman/status/1092982259517394944[19659022Thismisleadingrhetoricnotwithstandingshort-timecaremayalsomisleadinformationthatpreventspeoplefromreceivingmoreproductivehealthcare
Because of the restrictive laws that provide access to care early in the pregnancy, they say that they have abortion later than they would like. " Dr. Grossman: If the goal is to reduce the miscarriage in the second and third trimesters, it would be better if we override the access restrictions that are not based on science or safety.
After all, rhetoric like Trump is dangerous because it's effects in the real world for those seeking abortions and for anyone in need of them in the future. "[His comments] feed a narrative that only undermines the interests of women and families and health care providers who care for themselves d To deploy this vital care, "says Dr. Parker.
Dr. Grossman agrees. In addition to increasing the stigma surrounding abortion, "19459125" ignored the lived experience of patients who had a later abortion and instead uses ridiculous hypothetical situations that are in no way similar to the actual situations faced by medical providers ", he says. "It's an absurd way to have a political discussion about medical care."