Few rock bands are anywhere near as iconic as Fleetwood Mac, but according to a recent interview with Stevie Nicks in The guardThe band would likely have shortened their rise to fame if they hadn’t terminated pregnancy in 1979.
“If I hadn’t had this abortion, it would be pretty sure there wouldn’t have been a Fleetwood Mac,” 72-year-old Nicks told the newspaper.
At the time of her abortion, Nicks was dating the Eagles singer Don Henley. Fleetwood Mac had already released Rumorsand the band was at its peak. It was just not a good time for Nicks to have a child, she said. “There was no way I could have had a child back then who worked as hard as we worked all the time. And there were a lot of drugs, I did a lot of drugs … I should have left. “
Since the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who referred to Nick as a “heroine,”
Nicks explained that her decision to have an abortion largely depended on the purpose that Fleetwood Mac served and what that represented to female artists. “I knew that the music we were going to bring into the world would heal so many people’s hearts and make people so happy. And I thought: you know what? It’s really important, ”she said. “Two singers, two writers. That was my world’s mission. “
The singer fears abortion will be banned if Conservative Judge Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed as the new Supreme Court Justice after President Trump nominated her for the role and if former Vice President Joe Biden fails to win the upcoming election. Abortion lawyers fear what Barrett’s endorsement could mean Roe v. calf, the 1973 Supreme Court decision that the constitutional right to privacy was extended to include abortion, thereby legalizing abortion in the United States. It is clear that Barrett has personally opposed abortion in the past. What is less clear is whether a Supreme Court would actually upset Barrett Roe v. calf or, possibly, cut off access to abortion in other decisions. According to CNN, Barrett said in 2017, “Roe has been retrofitted many times and endured many challenges in court. He is over 40 years old and clearly binding on all appeals courts. Therefore, he is not open to.” Me or up to me, and I would have no interest, as a judge of the appeals court, in questioning this precedent – it would be binding. “
With regard to President Trump, he has made it clear that he wants to lift federal abortion protection. He has promised to continue filling the Supreme Court and the lower courts with anti-abortion judges. He’s also stopped federal funding from going to U.S. organizations that offer abortions and supported numerous other restrictions on abortion, which you can read more about here.