قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Fitness Tips / Nike Zoom Fly 3 Running Shoe review

Nike Zoom Fly 3 Running Shoe review



It's impossible to talk about the Nike Zoom Fly 3 shoe without talking about the shoes that does not exist namely the Nike Zoom Vaporfly 4% and NEXT%. These are the top endurance racing shoes from Nike that have helped elites and amateurs set PBs in recent years.

The Vaporfly is an amazing shoe in terms of both performance and price. The NEXT% is £ 239.95 and the 4% is £ 209.95, and both shoes take precedence over durability, making them best for your most important days of racing. Vaporfly's performance is impressive but much cheaper and longer lasting, and that's the Zoom Fly 3 to a T. Like the Vaporfly, it has a carbon plate in the midsole and is designed for fast running. However, it costs a little less £ 1

39.95, while the React foam in its midsole is much more durable than the ZoomX foam used in the Vaporfly.

I've used all three editions of the Zoom Fly, and this is the best. However, it's also the one I'm reluctant to buy. This is because two other current shoes better serve the purpose of the Zoom Fly: the Hoka Carbon X also has a carbon plate in its midsole, while the New Balance FuelCell Rebel is a great, lightweight shoe that can be used for training and racing cheapest of the three.

That does not mean the Zoom Fly 3 is not a great running shoe. I've used it for a variety of fast-paced sessions, including track and tempo, as well as a 22km run with a decent clip. The farther I went, the more I appreciate its features: the carbon plate and the bouncy React foam provide a fast pace with less effort, with a smooth transition from heel to toe and a driving toe off through the plate in the midsole.

However, on shorter runs and during track intervals, I was less fond of the Zoom Fly 3. It's just a bit too much shoe to make me feel speedy with the chunky pile of React foam feeling cumbersome and a little hard. This is an area where the Hoka Carbon X, in my opinion, has the edge of the Zoom Fly 3. He also has a large stack of upholstery and the shoes both weigh about 250g (men), but the Carbon X feels snug and lighter at the foot for short and fast runs.

The same applies to the New Balance Rebel, which does not have a carbon plate, but feels faster with the FuelCell foam in the midsole than the Zoom Fly 3 and also much lighter at just over 200g. Another advantage for the Rebel is that it is cheaper at £ 120, while the Hoka Carbon X costs £ 159.99.

I liked the new upper of the Zoom Fly 3, the most comprehensive update of the shoe. In the previous version, a Flyknit upper was used that absorbs water and expands slightly over time, thus losing the desired fit when running fast. The upper of the Zoom Fly 3 does not seem to be as thin as that of the NEXT%, although both are made from the same vaporweave material, but provides a snug fit and does not retain it in water.

If you have the Vaporfly 4% or NEXT% for racing and just want to use the next possible shoe for fast training, Zoom Fly 3 is for you. If you think of it as a cheaper alternative to vaporfly on its own, there are better options. Hokas Carbon X has the carbon fiber that everyone wants today, and feels lighter on the foot than the Zoom Fly, while the New Balance Rebel is simply a great all-around shoe that's fun to run fast at any distance.

Buy Men from Nike | Buy Women at Nike | £ 139.95


Source link